Waste Minimisation: The Systematic Reduction of Waste at Source | |
| |
![]() |
Most companies are unaware of the true cost of waste to their business. Figures of 4-5 % of turnover are generally quoted but it may be higher and as much as 10% is not unusual. The ETBPP guidance GG38 suggests that most companies can reduce operating costs by at least 1% of turnover by implementing fairly simple waste management controls. |
Companies often feel that introducing waste management programmes or improving environmental performance will cost money rather than saving it, but a good waste minimisation programme will review how waste arises in the business, help the company to develop solutions and both reduce costs and improve environmental performance. The table below indicates some of the savings made during the Dee Catchment Waste minimisation project, which ran for 18 months. As can be seen from the table the method is beneficial to both small and large companies. |
|
|
Company |
£ achieved Savings/annum |
Number of opportunities identified |
Number of employees |
British Aerospace Airbus |
126,000 |
3 |
2200 |
British Steel, Shotton |
784,000 |
5 |
1,600 |
GS Packaging |
516,000 |
10 |
100 |
Kimberly-Clark |
397,000 |
4 |
85 |
Kronospan |
811,000 |
6 |
460 |
KnitMesh |
125,000 |
9 |
220 |
Mixalloy |
392,000 |
5 |
75 |
Optical Fibres |
510,000 |
18 |
550 |
Owens Cornong |
340,000 |
25 |
530 |
Rexam Cutsom |
210,000 |
120 |
100 |
Royal Ordnance |
91,000 |
8 |
580 |
Sharp Manufacturing |
100,000 |
10 |
1,100 |
Tarmac Quarry Products |
161,000 |
8 |
16 |